Getting
robots to fulfil our basic Maszlow needs is only an existential threat
if we buy into the idea that we invariably need to pay someone in order
to exist on this physical plane (and this is an idea we have been
robustly encouraged to subscribe to throughout the ages - but that's
another story for another time). This is a critical point in human evolution (as we all know!).
I should make it clear that I'm not at all in favour of the forced
redistribution of wealth from other human beings who have worked hard to
amass it but the work of robots is a different kind of energy exchange.
Whatever corporate entity has the means to build robots to take away
menial labour irrespective of our wishes only serves to create an
economy in which there are almost no customers (i.e. a moribund one). At
this point it either becomes a naked, tyrannical master-slave
relationship or the true free market kicks in to correct things.
If robots start generating all the food and building all the shelter, yet not distributing the overwhelming surplus to the enormous slice of humanity they have made obsolete, who *are* they giving it to? A correction would be inevitable, by hook or by crook. So to speak.
Image by OpenClipart-Vectors from Pixabay
No comments:
Post a Comment